StudentsEducators

Nyquist Stability Criterion

The Nyquist Stability Criterion is a graphical method used in control theory to assess the stability of a linear time-invariant (LTI) system based on its open-loop frequency response. This criterion involves plotting the Nyquist plot, which is a parametric plot of the complex function G(jω)G(j\omega)G(jω) over a range of frequencies ω\omegaω. The key idea is to count the number of encirclements of the point −1+0j-1 + 0j−1+0j in the complex plane, which is related to the number of poles of the closed-loop transfer function that are in the right half of the complex plane.

The criterion states that if the number of counterclockwise encirclements of −1-1−1 (denoted as NNN) is equal to the number of poles of the open-loop transfer function G(s)G(s)G(s) in the right half-plane (denoted as PPP), the closed-loop system is stable. Mathematically, this relationship can be expressed as:

N=PN = PN=P

In summary, the Nyquist Stability Criterion provides a powerful tool for engineers to determine the stability of feedback systems without needing to derive the characteristic equation explicitly.

Other related terms

contact us

Let's get started

Start your personalized study experience with acemate today. Sign up for free and find summaries and mock exams for your university.

logoTurn your courses into an interactive learning experience.
Antong Yin

Antong Yin

Co-Founder & CEO

Jan Tiegges

Jan Tiegges

Co-Founder & CTO

Paul Herman

Paul Herman

Co-Founder & CPO

© 2025 acemate UG (haftungsbeschränkt)  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Privacy Policy  |   Imprint  |   Careers   |  
iconlogo
Log in

Complex Analysis Residue Theorem

The Residue Theorem is a powerful tool in complex analysis that allows for the evaluation of complex integrals, particularly those involving singularities. It states that if a function is analytic inside and on some simple closed contour, except for a finite number of isolated singularities, the integral of that function over the contour can be computed using the residues at those singularities. Specifically, if f(z)f(z)f(z) has singularities z1,z2,…,znz_1, z_2, \ldots, z_nz1​,z2​,…,zn​ inside the contour CCC, the theorem can be expressed as:

∮Cf(z) dz=2πi∑k=1nRes(f,zk)\oint_C f(z) \, dz = 2 \pi i \sum_{k=1}^{n} \text{Res}(f, z_k)∮C​f(z)dz=2πik=1∑n​Res(f,zk​)

where Res(f,zk)\text{Res}(f, z_k)Res(f,zk​) denotes the residue of fff at the singularity zkz_kzk​. The residue itself is a coefficient that reflects the behavior of f(z)f(z)f(z) near the singularity and can often be calculated using limits or Laurent series expansions. This theorem not only simplifies the computation of integrals but also reveals deep connections between complex analysis and other areas of mathematics, such as number theory and physics.

Mems Gyroscope Working Principle

A MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) gyroscope operates based on the principles of angular momentum and the Coriolis effect. It consists of a vibrating structure that, when rotated, experiences a change in its vibration pattern. This change is detected by sensors within the device, which convert the mechanical motion into an electrical signal. The fundamental working principle can be summarized as follows:

  1. Vibrating Element: The core of the MEMS gyroscope is a vibrating mass, typically a micro-machined structure that oscillates at a specific frequency.
  2. Coriolis Effect: When the gyroscope is subjected to rotation, the Coriolis effect causes the vibrating mass to experience a deflection perpendicular to its direction of motion.
  3. Electrical Signal Conversion: This deflection is detected by capacitive or piezoelectric sensors, which convert the mechanical changes into an electrical signal proportional to the angular velocity.
  4. Output Processing: The electrical signals are then processed to provide precise measurements of the orientation or angular displacement.

In summary, MEMS gyroscopes utilize mechanical vibrations and the Coriolis effect to detect rotational movements, enabling a wide range of applications from smartphones to aerospace navigation systems.

Ferroelectric Domains

Ferroelectric domains are regions within a ferroelectric material where the electric polarization is uniformly aligned in a specific direction. This alignment occurs due to the material's crystal structure, which allows for spontaneous polarization—meaning the material can exhibit a permanent electric dipole moment even in the absence of an external electric field. The boundaries between these domains, known as domain walls, can move under the influence of external electric fields, leading to changes in the material's overall polarization. This property is essential for various applications, including non-volatile memory devices, sensors, and actuators. The ability to switch polarization states rapidly makes ferroelectric materials highly valuable in modern electronic technologies.

Kernel Pca

Kernel Principal Component Analysis (Kernel PCA) is an extension of the traditional Principal Component Analysis (PCA), which is used for dimensionality reduction and feature extraction. Unlike standard PCA, which operates in the original feature space, Kernel PCA employs a kernel trick to project data into a higher-dimensional space where it becomes easier to identify patterns and structure. This is particularly useful for datasets that are not linearly separable.

In Kernel PCA, a kernel function K(xi,xj)K(x_i, x_j)K(xi​,xj​) computes the inner product of data points in this higher-dimensional space without explicitly transforming the data. Common kernel functions include the polynomial kernel and the radial basis function (RBF) kernel. The primary step involves calculating the covariance matrix in the feature space and then finding its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, which allows for the extraction of the principal components. By leveraging the kernel trick, Kernel PCA can uncover complex structures in the data, making it a powerful tool in various applications such as image processing, bioinformatics, and more.

Dc-Dc Buck-Boost Conversion

Dc-Dc Buck-Boost Conversion is a type of power conversion that allows a circuit to either step down (buck) or step up (boost) the input voltage to a desired output voltage level. This versatility is crucial in applications where the input voltage may vary above or below the required output voltage, such as in battery-powered devices. The buck-boost converter uses an inductor, a switch (usually a transistor), a diode, and a capacitor to regulate the output voltage.

The operation of a buck-boost converter can be described mathematically by the following relationship:

Vout=Vin⋅D1−DV_{out} = V_{in} \cdot \frac{D}{1-D}Vout​=Vin​⋅1−DD​

where VoutV_{out}Vout​ is the output voltage, VinV_{in}Vin​ is the input voltage, and DDD is the duty cycle of the switch, ranging from 0 to 1. This flexibility in voltage regulation makes buck-boost converters ideal for various applications, including renewable energy systems, electric vehicles, and portable electronics.

Smith Predictor

The Smith Predictor is a control strategy used to enhance the performance of feedback control systems, particularly in scenarios where there are significant time delays. This method involves creating a predictive model of the system to estimate the future behavior of the process variable, thereby compensating for the effects of the delay. The key concept is to use a dynamic model of the process, which allows the controller to anticipate changes in the output and adjust the control input accordingly.

The Smith Predictor consists of two main components: the process model and the controller. The process model predicts the output based on the current input and the known dynamics of the system, while the controller adjusts the input based on the predicted output rather than the delayed actual output. This approach can be particularly effective in systems where the delays can lead to instability or poor performance.

In mathematical terms, if G(s)G(s)G(s) represents the transfer function of the process and TdT_dTd​ the time delay, the Smith Predictor can be formulated as:

Y(s)=G(s)U(s)e−TdsY(s) = G(s)U(s) e^{-T_d s}Y(s)=G(s)U(s)e−Td​s

where Y(s)Y(s)Y(s) is the output, U(s)U(s)U(s) is the control input, and e−Tdse^{-T_d s}e−Td​s represents the time delay. By effectively 'removing' the delay from the feedback loop, the Smith Predictor enables more responsive and stable control.