The Prisoner Dilemma is a fundamental concept in game theory that illustrates how two individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interest to do so. The scenario typically involves two prisoners who are arrested and interrogated separately. Each prisoner has the option to either cooperate with the other by remaining silent or defect by betraying the other.
The outcomes are structured as follows:
The dilemma arises because, from the perspective of each prisoner, betraying the other offers a better personal outcome regardless of what the other does. Thus, the rational choice leads both to defect, resulting in a worse overall outcome (3 years each) than if they had both cooperated (1 year each). This paradox highlights the conflict between individual rationality and collective benefit, making it a key concept in understanding cooperation and competition in various fields, including economics, politics, and sociology.
Start your personalized study experience with acemate today. Sign up for free and find summaries and mock exams for your university.