The Ricardian Equivalence proposition suggests that consumers are forward-looking and will adjust their savings behavior based on government fiscal policy. Specifically, if the government increases debt to finance spending, rational individuals anticipate higher future taxes to repay that debt, leading them to save more now to prepare for those future tax burdens. However, the Ricardian Equivalence Critique challenges this theory by arguing that in reality, several factors can prevent rational behavior from materializing:
In essence, the critique highlights that the assumptions underlying Ricardian Equivalence do not hold in the real world, suggesting that government debt may have different implications for consumption and savings than the theory predicts.
Start your personalized study experience with acemate today. Sign up for free and find summaries and mock exams for your university.