StudentsEducators

Functional Brain Networks

Functional brain networks refer to the interconnected regions of the brain that work together to perform specific cognitive functions. These networks are identified through techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which measures brain activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow. The brain operates as a complex system of nodes (brain regions) and edges (connections between regions), and various networks can be categorized based on their roles, such as the default mode network, which is active during rest and mind-wandering, or the executive control network, which is involved in higher-order cognitive processes. Understanding these networks is crucial for unraveling the neural basis of behaviors and disorders, as disruptions in functional connectivity can lead to various neurological and psychiatric conditions. Overall, functional brain networks provide a framework for studying how different parts of the brain collaborate to support our thoughts, emotions, and actions.

Other related terms

contact us

Let's get started

Start your personalized study experience with acemate today. Sign up for free and find summaries and mock exams for your university.

logoTurn your courses into an interactive learning experience.
Antong Yin

Antong Yin

Co-Founder & CEO

Jan Tiegges

Jan Tiegges

Co-Founder & CTO

Paul Herman

Paul Herman

Co-Founder & CPO

© 2025 acemate UG (haftungsbeschränkt)  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Privacy Policy  |   Imprint  |   Careers   |  
iconlogo
Log in

Lump Sum Vs Distortionary Taxation

Lump sum taxation refers to a fixed amount of tax that individuals or businesses must pay, regardless of their economic behavior or income level. This type of taxation is considered non-distortionary because it does not alter individuals' incentives to work, save, or invest; the tax burden remains constant, leading to minimal economic inefficiency. In contrast, distortionary taxation varies with income or consumption levels, such as progressive income taxes or sales taxes. These taxes can lead to changes in behavior—for example, higher tax rates may discourage work or investment, resulting in a less efficient allocation of resources. Economists often argue that while lump sum taxes are theoretically ideal for efficiency, they may not be politically feasible or equitable, as they can disproportionately affect lower-income individuals.

Support Vector

In the context of machine learning, particularly in Support Vector Machines (SVM), support vectors are the data points that lie closest to the decision boundary or hyperplane that separates different classes. These points are crucial because they directly influence the position and orientation of the hyperplane. If these support vectors were removed, the optimal hyperplane could change, affecting the classification of other data points.

Support vectors can be thought of as the "critical" elements of the training dataset; they are the only points that matter for defining the margin, which is the distance between the hyperplane and the nearest data points from either class. Mathematically, an SVM aims to maximize this margin, which can be expressed as:

Maximize2∥w∥\text{Maximize} \quad \frac{2}{\|w\|} Maximize∥w∥2​

where www is the weight vector orthogonal to the hyperplane. Thus, support vectors play a vital role in ensuring the robustness and accuracy of the classifier.

Jordan Normal Form Computation

The Jordan Normal Form (JNF) is a canonical form for a square matrix that simplifies the analysis of linear transformations. To compute the JNF of a matrix AAA, one must first determine its eigenvalues by solving the characteristic polynomial det⁡(A−λI)=0\det(A - \lambda I) = 0det(A−λI)=0, where III is the identity matrix and λ\lambdaλ represents the eigenvalues. For each eigenvalue, the next step involves finding the corresponding Jordan chains by examining the null spaces of (A−λI)k(A - \lambda I)^k(A−λI)k for increasing values of kkk until the null space stabilizes.

These chains help to organize the matrix into Jordan blocks, which are upper triangular matrices structured around the eigenvalues. Each block corresponds to an eigenvalue and its geometric multiplicity, while the size and number of blocks reflect the algebraic multiplicity and the number of generalized eigenvectors. The final Jordan Normal Form represents the matrix AAA as a block diagonal matrix, facilitating easier computation of functions of the matrix, such as exponentials or powers.

Cantor’S Diagonal Argument

Cantor's Diagonal Argument is a mathematical proof that demonstrates the existence of different sizes of infinity, specifically showing that the set of real numbers is uncountably infinite, unlike the set of natural numbers, which is countably infinite. The argument begins by assuming that all real numbers can be listed in a sequence. Cantor then constructs a new real number by altering the nnn-th digit of the nnn-th number in the list, ensuring that this new number differs from every number in the list at least at one decimal place. This construction leads to a contradiction because the newly created number cannot be found in the original list, implying that the assumption was incorrect. Consequently, there are more real numbers than natural numbers, highlighting that not all infinities are equal. Thus, Cantor's argument illustrates the concept of uncountable infinity, a foundational idea in set theory.

Hopcroft-Karp

The Hopcroft-Karp algorithm is a highly efficient method used for finding a maximum matching in a bipartite graph. A bipartite graph consists of two disjoint sets of vertices, where edges only connect vertices from different sets. The algorithm operates in two main phases: broadening and augmenting. During the broadening phase, it performs a breadth-first search (BFS) to identify the shortest augmenting paths, while the augmenting phase uses these paths to increase the size of the matching. The runtime of the Hopcroft-Karp algorithm is O(EV)O(E \sqrt{V})O(EV​), where EEE is the number of edges and VVV is the number of vertices in the graph, making it significantly faster than earlier methods for large graphs. This efficiency is particularly beneficial in applications such as job assignments, network flow problems, and various scheduling tasks.

New Keynesian Sticky Prices

The concept of New Keynesian Sticky Prices refers to the idea that prices of goods and services do not adjust instantaneously to changes in economic conditions, which can lead to short-term market inefficiencies. This stickiness arises from various factors, including menu costs (the costs associated with changing prices), contracts that fix prices for a certain period, and the desire of firms to maintain stable customer relationships. As a result, when demand shifts—such as during an economic boom or recession—firms may not immediately raise or lower their prices, leading to output gaps and unemployment.

Mathematically, this can be expressed through the New Keynesian Phillips Curve, which relates inflation (π\piπ) to expected future inflation (E[πt+1]\mathbb{E}[\pi_{t+1}]E[πt+1​]) and the output gap (yty_tyt​):

πt=βE[πt+1]+κyt\pi_t = \beta \mathbb{E}[\pi_{t+1}] + \kappa y_tπt​=βE[πt+1​]+κyt​

where β\betaβ is a discount factor and κ\kappaκ measures the sensitivity of inflation to the output gap. This framework highlights the importance of monetary policy in managing expectations and stabilizing the economy, especially in the face of shocks.