The Kaldor-Hicks efficiency criterion is an economic concept used to assess the efficiency of resource allocation in situations where policies or projects might create winners and losers. It asserts that a policy is deemed efficient if the total benefits to the winners exceed the total costs incurred by the losers, even if compensation does not occur. This can be expressed as:
In this sense, it allows for a broader evaluation of economic outcomes by focusing on aggregate welfare rather than individual fairness. The principle suggests that as long as the gains from a policy outweigh the losses, it can be justified, promoting economic growth and efficiency. However, critics argue that it overlooks the distribution of wealth and may lead to policies that harm vulnerable populations without adequate compensation mechanisms.
Start your personalized study experience with acemate today. Sign up for free and find summaries and mock exams for your university.