StudentsEducators

Microeconomic Elasticity

Microeconomic elasticity measures how responsive the quantity demanded or supplied of a good is to changes in various factors, such as price, income, or the prices of related goods. The most commonly discussed types of elasticity include price elasticity of demand, income elasticity of demand, and cross-price elasticity of demand.

  1. Price Elasticity of Demand: This measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in the price of the good itself. It is calculated as:
Ed=% change in quantity demanded% change in price E_d = \frac{\%\text{ change in quantity demanded}}{\%\text{ change in price}}Ed​=% change in price% change in quantity demanded​

If ∣Ed∣>1|E_d| > 1∣Ed​∣>1, demand is considered elastic; if ∣Ed∣<1|E_d| < 1∣Ed​∣<1, it is inelastic.

  1. Income Elasticity of Demand: This reflects how the quantity demanded changes in response to changes in consumer income. It is defined as:
Ey=% change in quantity demanded% change in income E_y = \frac{\%\text{ change in quantity demanded}}{\%\text{ change in income}}Ey​=% change in income% change in quantity demanded​
  1. Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand: This indicates how the quantity demanded of one good changes in response to a change in the price of another good, calculated as:
Exy=% change in quantity demanded of good X% change in price of good Y E_{xy} = \frac{\%\text{ change in quantity demanded of good X}}{\%\text{ change in price of good Y}}Exy​=% change in price of good Y% change in quantity demanded of good X​

Understanding these

Other related terms

contact us

Let's get started

Start your personalized study experience with acemate today. Sign up for free and find summaries and mock exams for your university.

logoTurn your courses into an interactive learning experience.
Antong Yin

Antong Yin

Co-Founder & CEO

Jan Tiegges

Jan Tiegges

Co-Founder & CTO

Paul Herman

Paul Herman

Co-Founder & CPO

© 2025 acemate UG (haftungsbeschränkt)  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Privacy Policy  |   Imprint  |   Careers   |  
iconlogo
Log in

Capital Deepening Vs Widening

Capital deepening and widening are two key concepts in economics that relate to the accumulation of capital and its impact on productivity. Capital deepening refers to an increase in the amount of capital per worker, often achieved through investment in more advanced or efficient machinery and technology. This typically leads to higher productivity levels as workers are equipped with better tools, allowing them to produce more in the same amount of time.

On the other hand, capital widening involves increasing the total amount of capital available without necessarily improving its quality. This might mean investing in more machinery or tools, but not necessarily more advanced ones. While capital widening can help accommodate a growing workforce, it does not inherently lead to increases in productivity per worker. In summary, while both strategies aim to enhance economic output, capital deepening focuses on improving the quality of capital, whereas capital widening emphasizes increasing the quantity of capital available.

Sallen-Key Filter

The Sallen-Key filter is a popular active filter topology used to create low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, and notch filters. It primarily consists of operational amplifiers (op-amps), resistors, and capacitors, allowing for precise control over the filter's characteristics. The configuration is known for its simplicity and effectiveness in achieving second-order filter responses, which exhibit a steeper roll-off compared to first-order filters.

One of the key advantages of the Sallen-Key filter is its ability to provide high gain while maintaining a flat frequency response within the passband. The transfer function of a typical Sallen-Key low-pass filter can be expressed as:

H(s)=K1+sω0+(sω0)2H(s) = \frac{K}{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_0} + \left( \frac{s}{\omega_0} \right)^2}H(s)=1+ω0​s​+(ω0​s​)2K​

where KKK is the gain and ω0\omega_0ω0​ is the cutoff frequency. Its versatility makes it a common choice in audio processing, signal conditioning, and other electronic applications where filtering is required.

Bohr Model Limitations

The Bohr model, while groundbreaking in its time for explaining atomic structure, has several notable limitations. First, it only accurately describes the hydrogen atom and fails to account for the complexities of multi-electron systems. This is primarily because it assumes that electrons move in fixed circular orbits around the nucleus, which does not align with the principles of quantum mechanics. Second, the model does not incorporate the concept of electron spin or the uncertainty principle, leading to inaccuracies in predicting spectral lines for atoms with more than one electron. Finally, it cannot explain phenomena like the Zeeman effect, where atomic energy levels split in a magnetic field, further illustrating its inadequacy in addressing the full behavior of atoms in various environments.

Brain-Machine Interface

A Brain-Machine Interface (BMI) is a technology that establishes a direct communication pathway between the brain and an external device, enabling the translation of neural activity into commands that can control machines. This innovative interface analyzes electrical signals generated by neurons, often using techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) or intracranial recordings. The primary applications of BMIs include assisting individuals with disabilities, enhancing cognitive functions, and advancing research in neuroscience.

Key aspects of BMIs include:

  • Signal Acquisition: Collecting data from neural activity.
  • Signal Processing: Interpreting and converting neural signals into actionable commands.
  • Device Control: Enabling the execution of tasks such as moving a prosthetic limb or controlling a computer cursor.

As research progresses, BMIs hold the potential to revolutionize both medical treatments and human-computer interaction.

Mott Insulator Transition

The Mott insulator transition is a phenomenon that occurs in strongly correlated electron systems, where an insulating state emerges due to electron-electron interactions, despite a band theory prediction of metallic behavior. In a typical metal, electrons can move freely, leading to conductivity; however, in a Mott insulator, the interactions between electrons become so strong that they localize, preventing conduction. This transition is characterized by a critical parameter, often the ratio of kinetic energy to potential energy, denoted as U/tU/tU/t, where UUU is the on-site Coulomb interaction energy and ttt is the hopping amplitude of electrons between lattice sites. As this ratio is varied (for example, by changing the electron density or temperature), the system can transition from insulating to metallic behavior, showcasing the delicate balance between interaction and kinetic energy. The Mott insulator transition has important implications in various fields, including high-temperature superconductivity and the understanding of quantum phase transitions.

Poincaré Recurrence Theorem

The Poincaré Recurrence Theorem is a fundamental result in dynamical systems and ergodic theory, stating that in a bounded, measure-preserving system, almost every point in the system will eventually return arbitrarily close to its initial position. In simpler terms, if you have a closed system where energy is conserved, after a sufficiently long time, the system will revisit states that are very close to its original state.

This theorem can be formally expressed as follows: if a set AAA in a measure space has a finite measure, then for almost every point x∈Ax \in Ax∈A, there exists a time ttt such that the trajectory of xxx under the dynamics returns to AAA. Thus, the theorem implies that chaotic systems, despite their complex behavior, exhibit a certain level of predictability over a long time scale, reinforcing the idea that "everything comes back" in a closed system.