Exercises & feedback
Knowledge becomes practice.
Create exercises from your course materials, adjust question type, level, and grading criteria, and share them directly in the course. Learners get immediate feedback. Educators see which questions still need work.
New exercise
Question type
Cognitive level
Language
Source
Chapter 3 · ExternalitiesGenerated question
DraftA chemical plant discharges untreated wastewater into a river. Show how a Pigouvian tax internalizes the external costs.
Model answer
editableThe tax equals the marginal damage cost. It lifts the private cost curve to the social level, so output falls to the efficient q*.
Grading criteria
3Learner answer
"The tax raises the plant's production cost, so output falls to the efficient level …"
That was right: mechanism applied correctly.
Still missing: a justified example.
Feedback right after submission, along your criteria.
Exercises & feedback
From learning goal to finished exercise in a few steps.
Set the level of challenge
Choose question type, language, and cognitive level. The result is exercises that match the learning goal instead of only testing recall.
Cognitive level
Show with an example how a Pigouvian tax works.
ApplyReuse the tasks you already have
Use your own tasks and existing documents as a starting point. Educators review and edit the question, model answer, and grading before anything is published.
In the editor
Task 4 · Justify the externality
Feedback while it still helps
Learners get a clear, structured response right after submitting. Educators see in aggregate which answer options and concepts cause difficulty across the course.
That was right: mechanism explained.
Still missing: an example.
Answer distribution · no names
Closer look
Practice, feedback, next steps.
Open answers with clear criteria
For open questions, acemate compares the answer against the model answer and grading criteria on file. Learners get specific feedback on correct reasoning, missing points, and a sensible next step. Educators can adjust the model answer and criteria beforehand and keep responsibility for the subject matter.
The exercise shows what the course needs
For shared exercises, the aggregated results show which questions are missed most often and which misconceptions keep returning. Educators can pick the topic up in the next session, share a follow-up exercise, or ask the Teaching Agent for a fitting deep dive.
One connected system
Related features
Who it serves
Who it serves
Your content. Your data. Your control.
acemate runs exclusively in EU data centers, complies with the GDPR and never uses your content to train AI models.
More on security & privacyFrequently asked questions
Educators can create closed and open exercise formats, such as multiple choice and open questions with a model answer. We are happy to show the current scope for your scenario in a demo of the live product.
Yes. Questions, model answers, and grading criteria can be reviewed and adjusted before sharing. Responsibility for the subject matter stays with the educator.
acemate gives automated feedback on practice answers based on the model answer and criteria you define. This is learning support, not automated grading of a formal exam.
Existing tasks and PDF-based documents can serve as a starting point. Depending on the document, it can make sense to split individual pages or tasks before uploading.
The analytics described here focus on patterns across the group. Educators see aggregated answer distributions and common difficulties, not individual monitoring or personal chat histories.
acemate supports practice and exam preparation. For formal, supervised, and graded exams, your existing examination infrastructure remains the right place.
Bring your own tasks.
In a demo, we show how they become an exercise with feedback and course-level learning signals.